<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing for yourself&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laurelsnyder.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Welch</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11310</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11310</guid>
		<description>Whoops! Thought I deleted that last line. But since I didn&#039;t -- In the sequel, I&#039;m thinking about having the children of the original characters be the main characters. At this point, the idea is just beginning to form. Time will tell if I ever get past the idea stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops! Thought I deleted that last line. But since I didn&#8217;t &#8212; In the sequel, I&#8217;m thinking about having the children of the original characters be the main characters. At this point, the idea is just beginning to form. Time will tell if I ever get past the idea stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Welch</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11309</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11309</guid>
		<description>Hi, Lurel,

I&#039;m participating in the discussion with you on Goodreads about BIGGER THAN A BREAD BOX, so I decided to check out your other books and blog. I&#039;m so glad I did! 

Your description of working on the book about Rebecca&#039;s mother is fascinating. I, too, obsess about getting things right even though many readers won&#039;t notice. I&#039;ve been working on a novel with a time slip element. The great grandmother in the story has Alzheimer&#039;s, and I am trying to decide whether to have the slip be real or part of the confusion with time that can be part of the illness. Now that I&#039;m a grandmother myself, time has become such an issue in my life. Anyhow, I loved BIGGER THAN A BREAD BOX and now look forward to reading more of your books.

I&#039;ve had an idea for a sequel to a fantasy novel that I wrote many years ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Lurel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m participating in the discussion with you on Goodreads about BIGGER THAN A BREAD BOX, so I decided to check out your other books and blog. I&#8217;m so glad I did! </p>
<p>Your description of working on the book about Rebecca&#8217;s mother is fascinating. I, too, obsess about getting things right even though many readers won&#8217;t notice. I&#8217;ve been working on a novel with a time slip element. The great grandmother in the story has Alzheimer&#8217;s, and I am trying to decide whether to have the slip be real or part of the confusion with time that can be part of the illness. Now that I&#8217;m a grandmother myself, time has become such an issue in my life. Anyhow, I loved BIGGER THAN A BREAD BOX and now look forward to reading more of your books.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had an idea for a sequel to a fantasy novel that I wrote many years ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Barrett</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11295</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11295</guid>
		<description>Sorry that got so long!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that got so long!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Barrett</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11294</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11294</guid>
		<description>Laurel,

When I did this with a story, I found it challenging.  Had written one in which a couple were married, with a child.  The couple was not the center of the story (the woman&#039;s family was), but I kept wondering after the story was published how they had ever gotten together, because of their different backgrounds, and something the wife thought about her single days kept reverberating.  So I set myself the task of writing a story that centered on one night, when they were new lovers, when they could have gone forward, or not--as far as they knew--though I knew that somehow they had to end up the people in the first (in time, the second) story. Oh, and also, the story had to be able to be published on its own, and free-stand. It was an odd experience. I do usually have at least aspects of the ending in mind when I start a story, but of course these are always subject to discovery and change, so I don&#039;t feel constrained. At one point I told myself that if the people in the new story turned out not to be able to get to that future, I could just change their names and call them different characters. (It probably helped to imagine this escape hatch, but since the guy had a particular history that mattered, I really couldn&#039;t do it.) Anyway, I did write the story, and a third, set later. All three (in chronological order, rather than order of writing) are spaced through my collection Magpies (the one you heard me read from, at Sanibel). No one seems to have found any disjunction, but when I&#039;ve explained to book groups and other readers how I wrote them, it&#039;s been hard to explain what a test it was.  I have always been obsessed with time, and how we resee experience through time, and I like inventing forms for presenting time, in my stories. (One of the first I published was about a couple who broke up on the night of the time change in Spring, and how different it would have been if the hour hadn&#039;t been lost.) But thinking of it as a relationship between a completed work and another set earlier was a whole new thing.  Enjoy the challenge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurel,</p>
<p>When I did this with a story, I found it challenging.  Had written one in which a couple were married, with a child.  The couple was not the center of the story (the woman&#8217;s family was), but I kept wondering after the story was published how they had ever gotten together, because of their different backgrounds, and something the wife thought about her single days kept reverberating.  So I set myself the task of writing a story that centered on one night, when they were new lovers, when they could have gone forward, or not&#8211;as far as they knew&#8211;though I knew that somehow they had to end up the people in the first (in time, the second) story. Oh, and also, the story had to be able to be published on its own, and free-stand. It was an odd experience. I do usually have at least aspects of the ending in mind when I start a story, but of course these are always subject to discovery and change, so I don&#8217;t feel constrained. At one point I told myself that if the people in the new story turned out not to be able to get to that future, I could just change their names and call them different characters. (It probably helped to imagine this escape hatch, but since the guy had a particular history that mattered, I really couldn&#8217;t do it.) Anyway, I did write the story, and a third, set later. All three (in chronological order, rather than order of writing) are spaced through my collection Magpies (the one you heard me read from, at Sanibel). No one seems to have found any disjunction, but when I&#8217;ve explained to book groups and other readers how I wrote them, it&#8217;s been hard to explain what a test it was.  I have always been obsessed with time, and how we resee experience through time, and I like inventing forms for presenting time, in my stories. (One of the first I published was about a couple who broke up on the night of the time change in Spring, and how different it would have been if the hour hadn&#8217;t been lost.) But thinking of it as a relationship between a completed work and another set earlier was a whole new thing.  Enjoy the challenge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11288</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11288</guid>
		<description>Laurel,

I can feel your frustration and joy with what you&#039;re doing, and I think it&#039;s exciting. I think it could yield the kind of reader moments that are amazing priceless astonishing. I experienced this in The Magician&#039;s Nephew and in The Neverending Story and in Asimov&#039;s Foundation/Robot novels. My spine unraveled in these moments. They are precious to me. You very well may be doing that very thing for some reader somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurel,</p>
<p>I can feel your frustration and joy with what you&#8217;re doing, and I think it&#8217;s exciting. I think it could yield the kind of reader moments that are amazing priceless astonishing. I experienced this in The Magician&#8217;s Nephew and in The Neverending Story and in Asimov&#8217;s Foundation/Robot novels. My spine unraveled in these moments. They are precious to me. You very well may be doing that very thing for some reader somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurel</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>AHHH! I want to sit over coffee and talk about our books. What an amazing coincidence!  I agree entirely, and your project sounds amazing. Don&#039;t be so hard on yourself. This is impossible stuff!!!

Mine also has death elements, but I don&#039;t want to give that away just yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHHH! I want to sit over coffee and talk about our books. What an amazing coincidence!  I agree entirely, and your project sounds amazing. Don&#8217;t be so hard on yourself. This is impossible stuff!!!</p>
<p>Mine also has death elements, but I don&#8217;t want to give that away just yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 04:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11274</guid>
		<description>Ahhh... This is why I stalk you - online only, in a purely admirable sort of wish-I-was-as-cool-as-Laurel-Snyder way. I love your blog and your books. These details you worry about are what make them so special. And as fate would have it, I just finished putting the final touches on a little novella prequel I wrote to be released as a teaser before my book comes out. 

It&#039;s also a mother/daughter story. The prequel deals with the mother as a girl, but I too wrote the book about the daughter first. The mother actually DIES in the first chapter of the book. Ouch eh? 

I found myself thinking about the same things you describe, only no where near your level of clarity and organization. (Yah, my work is probably a hot mess compared to yours. But that&#039;s ok.) I tried to carefully weave the dead mother&#039;s dreams for her daughter through out the book, showing why the main character was making her choices. Our mothers influence every part of our lives, living or dead, whether we want them to or not. In the prequel I tried to show more of who the mother was as a girl and where her desires for her daughter came from. You are right. It&#039;s a beautiful thread that I will probably be the only one to appreciate.

Can&#039;t wait to read 7 Stories Up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh&#8230; This is why I stalk you &#8211; online only, in a purely admirable sort of wish-I-was-as-cool-as-Laurel-Snyder way. I love your blog and your books. These details you worry about are what make them so special. And as fate would have it, I just finished putting the final touches on a little novella prequel I wrote to be released as a teaser before my book comes out. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a mother/daughter story. The prequel deals with the mother as a girl, but I too wrote the book about the daughter first. The mother actually DIES in the first chapter of the book. Ouch eh? </p>
<p>I found myself thinking about the same things you describe, only no where near your level of clarity and organization. (Yah, my work is probably a hot mess compared to yours. But that&#8217;s ok.) I tried to carefully weave the dead mother&#8217;s dreams for her daughter through out the book, showing why the main character was making her choices. Our mothers influence every part of our lives, living or dead, whether we want them to or not. In the prequel I tried to show more of who the mother was as a girl and where her desires for her daughter came from. You are right. It&#8217;s a beautiful thread that I will probably be the only one to appreciate.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to read 7 Stories Up <img src='http://laurelsnyder.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurel</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11273</link>
		<dc:creator>laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11273</guid>
		<description>Wendy, as always, you&#039;re the kind of reader I want to be writing for. Yes, exactly.  As always, Eager was part of the inspiration for this.  Mine also has a Johns Hopkins reference, and is in Baltimore for the overlap.  Beyond that the books are very different, but yes, exactly.    Thank you for reminding me that kids do read WITH CARE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy, as always, you&#8217;re the kind of reader I want to be writing for. Yes, exactly.  As always, Eager was part of the inspiration for this.  Mine also has a Johns Hopkins reference, and is in Baltimore for the overlap.  Beyond that the books are very different, but yes, exactly.    Thank you for reminding me that kids do read WITH CARE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754&#038;cpage=1#comment-11271</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelsnyder.com/?p=1754#comment-11271</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t answering your question at all, because I&#039;m not a writer. But I&#039;m going to protest that this DOES matter. It&#039;s what&#039;s going to provide the emotional truth to the book. (Or at least part of it.) You remember the complex sequence in Edward Eager between the parents and children in Magic By the Lake and The Time Garden? I went over it umpteen times as a child (and probably a couple as an adult. As I recall, he didn&#039;t make a single misstep in that whole messy situation. I demanded ACCURACY from authors as a kid--I&#039;m only a little more forgiving as an adult--and Eager would have lost a lot of face with me if there had been errors or places where he chose to ignore what had been written before. The whole thing is a work of beauty. But even beyond that one chapter, Eager had to wrestle with the same questions you are, because he wrote one set of children and then wrote them as parents with children of their own, and then wrote them as children again. He had to maintain the things you talk about--how would a child like Katharine be as a mother? what would Katharine&#039;s children be like? and then what would a mother like Katharine be like as a child?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t answering your question at all, because I&#8217;m not a writer. But I&#8217;m going to protest that this DOES matter. It&#8217;s what&#8217;s going to provide the emotional truth to the book. (Or at least part of it.) You remember the complex sequence in Edward Eager between the parents and children in Magic By the Lake and The Time Garden? I went over it umpteen times as a child (and probably a couple as an adult. As I recall, he didn&#8217;t make a single misstep in that whole messy situation. I demanded ACCURACY from authors as a kid&#8211;I&#8217;m only a little more forgiving as an adult&#8211;and Eager would have lost a lot of face with me if there had been errors or places where he chose to ignore what had been written before. The whole thing is a work of beauty. But even beyond that one chapter, Eager had to wrestle with the same questions you are, because he wrote one set of children and then wrote them as parents with children of their own, and then wrote them as children again. He had to maintain the things you talk about&#8211;how would a child like Katharine be as a mother? what would Katharine&#8217;s children be like? and then what would a mother like Katharine be like as a child?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
